requestId:68499aba30a922.65317201.
Twenty-two trainings of Confucius’ sentence “Everyone can be used to it”
Author: Wang Wenlong (Assistant Professor and Master Student Instructor of Chinese Department, School of Humanities, School of Humanities, Source: “Confucius Research: Academic Edition” 2017 Issue 6
Time: Confucius was in the 2569th year of the 25th century, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 25th, 26th, 26th, 26th, 26th, 26th, 26th, 26th, 26th, 26th, Jesus August 31, 2018
Content summary: The sentence “The common people can be used to make it, but they cannot make it known” seems to be inconsistent with Confucius’ Jiao Ting’s thoughts, Liang Qichao, Huan Yingqing and others took the lead in proposing a reading method of changing sentences. Later, those who learned it broadened it and expanded it, and this sentence has five different sentences to read. The author believes that regardless of whether the change sentence can be read and can be self-reliant, this practice is not a choice, because it not only has syntactic differences, but also violates the source of the teaching and receiving, and even the conditions it generates do not exist. Even under the condition of preserving the old sentence reading, the predecessors still have eighteen explanations that can be fully explained. The author gives a refinement on the twenty-two trainings of ancient and modern times (five sentence readings), and puts forward his own conclusions on this basis.
Keywords: “The Book of Thoughts”; I cannot make it know it; I read the sentence “The Book of Thoughts·Taibo” “It is easy to get it, but I cannot make it know it” because the literal reflection of the politician’s mind and power, it seems to be inconsistent with Confucius’ abstractions of “there are no teachings” (The Book of Thoughts·Wild and Spirituals), “I have never been able to learn from it” (The Book of Thoughts·Shuer) and “I have not yet understood it” (The Book of Thoughts·Shuer)), so people from ancient and modern times have doubts about this sentence. The author searched for classics and explained the four modified sentences of the ancients with the eighteen representative interpretations of the predecessors. He then wrote a comprehensive review and attached a view of the Confucius to make the right interpretation of the Fang family.
1. The four ways to read the sentence “Kang You guessed that “the sentence “is that can be easily obtained” can be obtained by Liu Xin’s words written by Confucius, and it is affixed to the ancient texts”①. However, Kang’s words have no literary version, but only the teacher’s intention to guess, so he has a good reputation.Qichao also wrote “Confucius Injustice”, and recommended that the sentence be read to “Entertainment is easy to approach, so that it can be followed; if it fails, it can be known”②. After Liang Qichao, the “Sutra” published in the second year of Jinjin (1913) proposed a new explanation: “Qing Notes: For those who say that they can be, they can be unrestrained; and those who cannot be accomplished can also be known. Some say: if you discuss what you can, they can be allowed to share it with them; if you fail to achieve it, they can also be known to share it with them. You can all have a word.” ③ The original book of “Sutra” is read without a sentence, but if you consider this sentence to cover the Internet car and horse tax, the target method is actually different from Liang Qichao. “The Book of Music” was originally written by Huan Maoyong, so the students of the ministry (such as Liao Mingchun and others) mistakenly attributed the right to invent this practice to Huan Maoyong, and did not see the reason why Liang Qichao’s article was before. However, if you look at the word “Qingbang” in the original text, you will know that this explanation comes from the mouth of Huan Maoyong’s son Huan Huiqing, and has nothing to do with Huan Maoyong himself. According to the “Speech Recitations: The book was just written, but the son of the ancestors changed his mind and came out to ask for the birth of the world. The year was not waiting, and the ambition was not fulfilled. Ying Qing did not think of his shame and inherited his ambition and added it to him. His favor and beauty were the oldest sons. Otherwise, the crime of not writing should be given to Qing.” ④ According to this, the “Qing Gong” after the “Yu Yong” was the added writing of Ying Qing after his father’s past life, and it failed to succeed as Mao Yong’s position. Li Kang Youwei, Liang Qichao, and Huan Huiqing all wanted to use Confucius’ components to promote their political views. Kang strongly advocated the transformation of the law, so Breed in love shaped Confucius as an abstract of Su Wang who was reorganized by ancient times. When all classics and characters differ from their ideas, they mean that they were transformed by Liu Xin; Liang was born in Kang’s family and promoted the monarch’s political affairs. The leader was one of the main points, so he changed the sentence reading, in order to use this language to promote the need for wisdom in order to make the political system as quickly as possible. The Huan also wanted to promote the concept of republic through Confucius’ name, so the “Speech” also wrote “Speech” “Speech” does not deviate from the will of the Republic” at the beginning of the volume, and this verb also aims to promote the cost of being unrestrained by the people. Since there is a picture, it is difficult to distort the original text and effectively protect Confucius’ abstraction without considering the original meaning of the text. It is precisely because of this that after the time of the country, Liang Qichao couldn’t prevent him from reading again.
Academic research has its own development and evolution. When the atmosphere of reading modified sentences is opened, there are naturally later people who follow and expand it: Taiwanese scholar Yu Zhihui once again took the same sentence reading method as him when Liang Qichao gave up his abandonment ⑤; Wang Chenglu, Wu Pi and others took the initiative to answer The sentence says, “You can use it to others, and you can use it to others; if you can’t make it, you can know it.” The explanations are different from each other. Wang Wei proposed to label this sentence as “You can use it to others, but if you can’t make it, you can use it to others, and you can’t make it to others”, which has been uncovered by later generations. Wang Changyan took a different approach and pointed this sentence as “You can use it to others? If you can use it to others, you can use it to others, and you can use it to others”, which has become Confucius’s own question and answer.Sentence ⑧. The above four methods of changing sentence reading can be expressed in their own way in terms of the meaning of the sentence. Similar new statements have been proposed, more students will inevitably devote themselves to spiritual support or rebuke a certain statement, and the problem will become more complicated. The author believes that the key to the problem is not to understand the interpretation of which sentence reading is more comprehensive, but to the fact that the practice of changing sentence reading is the most basic and unacceptable. It is the following three points:
(I) The condition of discussion is not true
The reason for changing sentence reading is to believe that the reading of the old sentence has become foolish and ordinary thinking, which is not consistent with Confucius’ teaching thinking, but this condition itself is not true. Even under the condition of preserving the old sentence reading, the predecessors still have eighteen explanations (see below) that can successfully solve this contradiction. Compared with the training of predecessors, the four practices of changing sentence reading have not shown strong advantages, but have only added an indescribable amount.
(2) Sentence Symbols and Syntax Differences
The first of the above four sentence reading methods is to be broken after the word “ke”, as Yang Bojun said: “I am afraid that the predecessors would not have this language. If the predecessors have this meaning, they must use the word “典”, and even use the word “典” under the word “典” to emphasize “the five regular guests including various artists: host, comedy actor, actor, etc.”. If you write “典, please (典) to get it; if you fail, please (典) to know it, so that you will not be confused and misunderstood.” ⑨ Innocent this sentence. The second and third types are followed by the word “力”. However, in the whole book of “力”, except for this sentence, the word “力” appears nine times, and then add the words, such as “力·力·力·力·力
發佈留言